ProdPilot reasons across your artifacts. Here's what it does, grouped by the work it takes off your plate.
Surfaces the assumptions underneath
Suggests how to test each one
Buckets assumptions by what's at stake
Rechecks the set when something breaks
Catches contradictions across artifacts
Works with what you have
Point ProdPilot at an artifact and it reads past the confident wording to the assumptions holding up the bet — including the ones that were never stated. You decide which to keep, drop, or test.
Every assumption carries a status: untested, validated, proved wrong, or overtaken by a change in direction. ProdPilot proposes the changes; you confirm them. A status that's settled reads differently from one that was never checked.
For every assumption, ProdPilot suggests the experiment, prototype, or check that would tell you it's wrong — and who to ask, with the question to ask them.
When you learn something that disproves an assumption, ProdPilot looks at the ones connected to it and flags what's now in doubt — because assumptions about how people behave tend to fail in groups.
A decision that cuts against the strategy, an outcome resting on an assumption that no longer holds, a one-pager that's fallen out of line — ProdPilot reads across the set and surfaces what no longer agrees.
No perfect documentation required. ProdPilot works with the partial one-pager and the roadmap that reflects last month's thinking, reading your artifacts where they already live.
Tracks where each assumption stands
Not every assumption matters equally. ProdPilot places each one in a bucket by its stake — whether being wrong breaks the bet, weakens it, or is minor — so you know what to test first.
If you’ve ever had to piece together what actually changed and why— this is for you.
Let’s talk.